Facilitate Adoption. Anchor Change.

The success of a transformation project isn’t just about tools or plans—it’s about how teams experience the change. We help you identify invisible barriers, mobilize key stakeholders, and secure collective buy-in for sustainable and smooth transformations.

Our Change Management Methodology

Achieving sustainable transformation requires more than a one-size-fits-all approach: it demands proven methods combined with active listening, creativity, and individual commitment.

Our approach integrates best practices from research and field experience: we combine leading change management models (Hérbemont & César, Kotter, ADKAR, Pareto) with proven communication methods (Transactional Analysis, Communication Objectification) to structure each phase, engage all stakeholders, and ensure both individual and collective adoption.

This progressive, structured, and human-centered approach effectively guides change from initial analysis through to embedding new practices, while fostering creativity and collective problem-solving.

PROVIDE COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK
ENSURE STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
SECURE INDIVIDUAL BUY-IN AND EVOLUTION
INITIAL CONTACT
(M-1)
Diagnostic survey, field workshops, network contribution, vision development
LAUNCH
(1-3 MONTHS)
Pilot project initiation, support, engagement/onboarding
EXPERIMENTATION
(3-6 MONTHS)
Testing, adjustments, consolidation
DEPLOYMENT & ANCHORING
(6+ MONTHS)
Best practices dissemination, sustainable integration
MONITORING & LESSONS LEARNED Individual and collective follow-up and reinforcement
CHANGE MANAGEMENT APPROACH
Methodology diagram
PHASE 1 – DIAGNOSTIC AND STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
  • Create a sense of urgency
  • Identify key stakeholders and influence networks
  • Generate awareness
  • Prioritize high-impact levers (20%)
  • Objectify hidden tensions
[Continue with other phases following the same structure…]
PHASE 5 – MONITORING, STEERING AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
  • Track adoption metrics and adjust actions
  • Reduce low-value efforts
  • Maintain effective relationship dynamics
  • Use triangulated frameworks to manage complexity and structure feedback